Login or become a OHS Alert subscriber

No duty to warn worker of specific trip hazard

A court has thrown out an injured worker's claim that two duty holders should have provided him with a walk-around induction, and marked all trip hazards with fluorescent paint, at a 1.7km-long work site.

You need to be logged in to read this article.

Subscribers log in here

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

Non subscribers: Access OHS Alert by starting your subscription here.

Haven't seen OHS Alert before? For a 28-day free trial sign up here.

Go back to our homepage here.

Latest news
Employer loses appeal in "recess" case of worker injured outside her workplace perimeter Designer and certifier breach upstream WHS duties Budget allocates millions to "safer workplaces" Deemed job diseases list amended, COVID deleted Case study: being tuned into remote workers' lives fosters real flexibility and wellbeing
Jurisdiction
AustMap Tasmania Victoria South Australia New South Wales Australian Capital Territory Queensland the Northern Territitory Western Australia National / Commonwealth
OHS case studies
Case study: being tuned into remote workers' lives fosters real flexibility and wellbeing Q&A: Wellbeing program reduces stress and anxiety, and targets sedentary risks Food strategy combats brain fog in hazardous industry Boeing review reveals distrust of work safety reporting Four-day week reducing stress and absences at Medibank